← Back to Sessions

Broodscale Talisman Land Count Comparison

1 requestsStarted 9/22/2026, 9:34:34 PM
compare winrate and volume of broodscale lists playing 2 talisman of resilience + 22 lands with list playing 2 talisman of relilience + 23 lands

I'll need to find the relevant card IDs and archetype info first, then build custom queries to compare these specific configurations!

Got the IDs. Now let me find the land card IDs and query the database for both configurations simultaneously.

🛠️QueryLand cards in Broodscale decks
🛠️QueryBroodscale Talisman Configuration Winrate Comparison

Here's the comparison over the last 90 days:

Broodscale: 2 Talisman of Resilience — Land Count Comparison

ConfigEntriesWinsLossesDrawsWinrate
2 Talisman + 22 Lands762782091057.1%
2 Talisman + 23 Lands31511157.7%

Key Takeaways:

  • The 22-land build is overwhelmingly the consensus — 76 entries vs just 3 for 23 lands. This is essentially the established configuration.
  • Winrates are nearly identical (57.1% vs 57.7%), so the 23-land sample shows no meaningful performance edge — and with only 3 entries, that data is far too small to draw conclusions.
  • Both configurations outperform the archetype's overall 52.9% winrate, suggesting that running 2 Talismans specifically is a stronger-than-average build choice.

Bottom line: The 22-land list is the clear community consensus and has ample data to back it up. The 23-land variant is a fringe experiment — treat its winrate as noise.

Sources — Data from 93 tournaments over the last 90 days (70% MTGO, 30% Melee):