The matchup returned zero recorded matches between Mono Green Broodscale and Izzet Prowess over the last two weeks in Modern. This likely means one or both archetypes had very little overlap in the same events during this window, or the specific pairing simply did not occur in the tracked data. Let me check if both archetypes are individually present in the meta right now.
Interesting - the Izzet Prowess result resolved to Standard, not Modern. Let me search for the correct Modern versions of both archetypes.
Now I can see both archetypes are in Modern as "Broodscale" and "Prowess." Let me now get the correct matchup data using those names.
Here's the head-to-head data for the last two weeks in Modern (Sep 8 - Sep 22):
Broodscale vs Prowess matchup: Broodscale wins 182, losses 155, draws 4, out of 341 total matches. That works out to a 54.0% winrate for Broodscale (excluding draws), a meaningful edge for the combo deck.
Both archetypes are among the most-played in the format right now - Broodscale leads the meta at 13.6% presence with a 55.0% overall winrate, while Prowess sits at 11.0% presence and is slightly negative at 49.4% overall. The Broodscale vs Prowess matchup reflects that broader gap: Broodscale has a clear but not dominant advantage in this pairing specifically.
Sources: Data drawn from 53 Modern tournaments over the two-week window (57% Melee, 43% MTGO). Sample events include: