Let me look up several things simultaneously — the Prowess archetype overview, search for Boomerang Basics, and pull the Modern format details.
Got both IDs. Now let me run the performance splits — with and without Boomerang Basics in Prowess maindecks — over the last 60 days.
Let me fix that match-level query:
The match-level query returned 0s, which suggests the matches table uses entry_id differently. Let me check the schema more carefully:
Got it — the result values use full words (WIN/LOSS/DRAW). Here's the complete picture:
| Group | Entries | Wins | Losses | Draws | Winrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With Boomerang Basics | 188 | 425 | 425 | 11 | 50.0% |
| Without Boomerang Basics | 820 | 2052 | 2114 | 36 | 49.26% |
Takeaways:
Sources: Data from 150 Modern tournaments (Jul 30 – Sep 28, 2026); 64.7% MTGO / 35.3% Melee.